Surround masking reveals binocular adding and differencing channels.

Recent studies suggest that binocular adding S+ and differencing S- channels play an important role in binocular vision. To test for such a role in the context of binocular contrast detection and binocular summation, we employed a surround masking paradigm consisting of a central target disk surrounded by a mask annulus. All stimuli were horizontally oriented 0.5c/d sinusoidal gratings. Correlated stimuli were identical in interocular spatial phase while anticorrelated stimuli were opposite in interocular spatial phase. There were four target conditions: monocular left eye, monocular right eye, binocular correlated and binocular anticorrelated, and three surround mask conditions: no surround, binocularly correlated and binocularly anticorrelated. We observed consistent elevation of detection thresholds for monocular and binocular targets across the two binocular surround mask conditions. In addition, we found an interaction between the type of surround and the type of binocular target: both detection and summation were relatively enhanced by surround masks and targets with opposite interocular phase relationships and reduced by surround masks and targets with the same interocular phase relationships. The data were reasonably well accounted for by a model of binocular combination termed MAX (S+S-), in which the decision variable is the probability summation of modeled S+ and S- channel responses, with a free parameter determining the relative gains of the two channels. Our results support the existence of two channels involved in binocular combination, S+ and S-, whose relative gains are adjustable by surround context.

Corrective mechanisms of motion extrapolation.

Transmission and processing of sensory information in the visual system takes time. For motion perception, our brain can overcome this intrinsic neural delay through extrapolation mechanisms and accurately predict the current position of a continuously moving object. But how does the system behave when the motion abruptly changes and the prediction becomes wrong? Here we address this question by studying the perceived position of a moving object with various abrupt motion changes by human observers. We developed a task in which a bar is monotonously moving horizontally, and then motion suddenly stops, reverses, or disappears-then-reverses around two vertical stationary reference lines. Our results showed that participants overestimated the position of the stopping bar but did not perceive an overshoot in the motion reversal condition. When a temporal gap was added at the reverse point, the perceptual overshoot of the end point scaled with the gap durations. Our model suggests that the overestimation of the object position when it disappears is not linear as a function of its speeds but gradually fades out. These results can thus be reconciled in a single process where there is an interplay of the cortical motion prediction mechanisms and the late sensory transient visual inputs.

Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.

Purpose: Research on interocular synchronicity in amblyopia has demonstrated a deficit in synchronization (i.e., a neural processing delay) between the two eyes. Current methods for assessing interocular delay are either costly or ineffective for assessments in severe amblyopia. In this study, we adapted a novel protocol developed by Burge and Cormack based on continuous target tracking to measure the interocular delay on a wide range of amblyopes. Our main aims were to assess the accessibility of this protocol and to investigate the relationship between interocular delay and visual acuity. Methods: This protocol, which consists of tracking a target undergoing random lateral motion with the mouse cursor, is performed both binocularly and monocularly. The processing speed of a given eye is computed by comparing the changes in velocity of the target and mouse via cross-correlation. The difference in processing speed between the eyes defines the interocular delay. Results: Cross-correlations revealed that the amblyopic eye tends to be delayed in time compared with the fellow eye. Interocular delays fell in the range of 0.6 to 114.0 ms. The magnitude of the delay was positively correlated with differences in interocular visual acuity (R2 = 0.484; P = 0.0002). Conclusions: These results demonstrate the accessibility of this new protocol and further support the link between interocular synchronicity and amblyopia. Furthermore, we determine that the interocular delay in amblyopia is best explained by a deficit in the temporal integration of the amblyopic eye.

Applying Resampling and Visualization Methods in Factor Analysis to Model Human Spatial Vision.

Purpose: Studies have reported different numbers of spatial frequency channels for chromatic and achromatic vision. To resolve the difference, we performed factor analysis, a multivariate modeling technique, on population data of achromatic and chromatic sensitivity. In addition, we included resampling and visualization methods to evaluate models from factor analysis. These routines are complex but widely useful. Therefore we have archived our analysis routines by building smCSF, an open-source software package in R (https://smin95.github.io/dataviz/). Methods: Data of 103 normally-sighted adults were analyzed. They included blue-yellow, red-green, and achromatic contrast sensitivity. To obtain the confidence interval of relevant statistical parameters, factor analysis was performed using a resampling method. Then exploratory models were developed. We then performed model selections by fitting them against the empirical data and quantifying the quality of the fits. Results: During the exploratory factor analysis, different statistical tests supported different factor models. These could partially be reasons for why there have been conflicting reports. However, after the confirmatory analysis, we found that a model that included two spatial channels was adequate to approximate the chromatic sensitivity data, whereas that with three channels was so for the achromatic sensitivity data. Conclusions: Our findings provide novel insights about the spatial channels for chromatic and achromatic contrast sensitivity from population data. Also, the analysis and visualization routines have been archived in a computational package to boost the transparency and replicability of science.

Spatial frequency channels depend on stimulus bandwidth in normal and amblyopic vision: an exploratory factor analysis.

The Contrast Sensitivity Function (CSF) is the measure of an observer's contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. It is a sensitive measure to assess visual function in fundamental and clinical settings. Human contrast sensitivity is subserved by different spatial frequency channels. Also, it is known that amblyopes have deficits in contrast sensitivity, particularly at high spatial frequencies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether the contrast sensitivity function is subtended by the same spatial frequency channels in control and amblyopic populations. To determine these spatial frequency channels, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on five datasets of contrasts sensitivity functions of amblyopic and control participants measured using either gratings or noise patches, taken from our previous studies. In the range of 0.25-10 c/d, we identified two spatial frequency channels. When the CSF was measured with noise patches, the spatial frequency channels presented very similar tuning in the amblyopic eye and the fellow eye and were also similar to what was observed in controls. The only major difference was that the weight attributed to the high frequency channel was reduced by approximately 50% in the amblyopic eye. However, when the CSF was measured using gratings, the spatial frequency channels of the amblyopic eye were tuned toward lower spatial frequencies. These findings suggest that there is no mechanistic deficit for contrast sensitivity in amblyopia and that amblyopic vision may just be subjected to excessive internal noise and attenuation at higher spatial frequencies, thereby supporting the use of therapeutic strategies that involve rebalancing contrast.

The Random Step Method for Measuring the Point of Subjective Equality.

Points of Subjective Equality (PSE) are commonly measured using staircase or constant stimuli methods. However, the staircase method is highly dependent on the step size, and the constant stimuli method is time-consuming. Thus, we wanted to develop an efficient and quick method to estimate both the PSE and the slope of the psychometric function. We developed a random-step algorithm in which a one-up-one-down rule is followed but with a random step size in a pre-defined range of test levels. Each stimulus would be chosen depending on the previous response of the subject. If the subject responded "up", any random level in the lower range would be picked for the next trial. And if the subject responded "down", any random level in the upper range would be picked for the next trial. This procedure would result in a bell-shaped distribution of the test levels around the estimated PSE, while a substantial amount of trials would still be dispersed at both bounds of the range. We then compared this method with traditional constant stimuli procedure on a task based on the Pulfrich phenomenon while the PSEs of participants could be varied using different neutral density filters. Our random-step method provided robust estimates of both the PSE and the slope under various noise levels with small trial counts, and we observed a significant correlation between the PSEs obtained with the two methods. The random-step method is an efficient way to measure the full psychometric function when testing time is critical, such as in clinical settings.

The Suppressive Basis of Ocular Dominance Changes Induced by Short-Term Monocular Deprivation in Normal and Amblyopic Adults.

Purpose: We aimed to study the effect of short-term monocular deprivation on the suppressive interocular interactions in normals and amblyopes by using a dichoptic masking paradigm. Methods: Nine adults with anisometropic or mixed amblyopia and 10 control adults participated in our study. The contrast sensitivity in discriminating a target Gabor dichoptically masked was measured before and after 2 hours of monocular deprivation. The mask consisted of bandpass-filtered noise. Both the target and the mask were horizontally oriented at the spatial frequency of 1.31 cpd. Deprivation was achieved using an opaque patch on the amblyopic eye of amblyopes and the dominant eye of controls. Results: Results were similar in both controls and amblyopes. After 2 hours of monocular deprivation, the previously patched eye showed a significant increase in contrast sensitivity under dichoptic masking, which also suggested reduced suppressive effect from the nonpatched eye. Meanwhile, the contrast sensitivity of the nonpatched eye remained almost unchanged under dichoptic masking. Conclusions: We demonstrate that the ocular dominance changes induced by short-term monocular deprivation-namely, the strengthening of the deprived eye's contribution-are associated with the unilateral and asymmetric changes in suppressive interaction. The suppression from the nondeprived eye is reduced after short-term monocular deprivation. This provides a better understanding of how inverse patching (patching of the amblyopic eye) could, by reducing the suppressive drive from the normally sighted (nondeprived) eye, form the basis of a new treatment for the binocular deficit in amblyopia.

Interocular Transfer: The Dichoptic Flash-Lag Effect in Controls and Amblyopes.

Purpose: The mammalian brain can take into account the neural delays in visual information transmission from the retina to the cortex when accurately localizing the instantaneous position of moving objects by motion extrapolation. In this study, we wanted to investigate whether such extrapolation mechanism operates in a comparable fashion between the eyes in normally sighted and amblyopic observers. Methods: To measure interocular extrapolation, we adapted a dichoptic version of the flash-lag effect (FLE) paradigm, in which a flashed bar is perceived to lag behind a moving bar when their two positions are physically aligned. Twelve adult subjects with amblyopia and 12 healthy controls participated in the experiment. We measured the FLE magnitude of the subjects under binocular, monocular, and dichoptic conditions. Results: In controls, the FLE magnitude of binocular condition was significantly smaller than that of monocular conditions (P ≤ 0.023), but there was no difference between monocular and dichoptic conditions. Subject with amblyopia exhibited a smaller FLE magnitude in the dichoptic condition when the moving bar was presented to the amblyopic eye and the flash to the fellow eye (DA condition) compared to the opposite way around (DF condition), consistent with a delay in the processing of the amblyopic eye (P = 0.041). Conclusions: Our observations confirm that trajectory extrapolation mechanisms transfer between the eyes of normal observers. However, such transfer may be impaired in amblyopia. The smaller FLE magnitude in DA compared to DF in patients with amblyopia could be due to an interocular delay in the amblyopic visual system. The observation that normal controls present a smaller FLE in binocular conditions raises the question whether a larger FLE is or is not an indicator of better motion processing and extrapolation.

A brief light reduction induces a significant delay in the previously dimmed eye.

PURPOSE: We investigated how a short-term luminance reduction in one eye can influence temporal processing of that eye after luminance is restored by measuring the relative delay between the eyes. METHODS: A paradigm based on the Pulfrich effect, which is a visual illusion of depth when no depth cue is present, was used to measure relative delay in visual processing between the eyes. We deprived the monocular luminance in adults with normal vision across different intensities. In the first experiment, the ratio of the light level between the eyes stayed constant, whereas the absolute value was allowed to vary. In the second experiment, both the ratio and the absolute light level stayed constant, by controlling the environmental light level. In both experiments, we measured the changes in relative delay before and after 60 min of light deprivation. RESULTS: Our results indicated that short-term monocular deprivation of luminance slows the processing in the previously dimmed eye and that the magnitude of the delay is correlated with the degree of luminance reduction. In addition, we observed that the absolute luminance difference, rather than the absolute luminance levels seen by the dimmed eye, is important in determining the magnitude of delay in the previously dimmed eye. These findings differ from what has been reported previously for the monocular deprivation of contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings support the view that short-term deprivation of visual information could affect two distinct mechanisms (contrast gain and temporal dynamics) of neural plasticity.

The Orientation Selectivity of Dichoptic Masking Suppression is Contrast Dependent in Amblyopia.

Purpose: We aimed to study the effect of stimulus contrast on the orientation selectivity of interocular interaction in amblyopia using a dichoptic masking paradigm. Methods: Eight adults with anisometropic or mixed amblyopia and 10 control adults participated in our study. The contrast threshold in discriminating a target Gabor in the tested eye was measured with mean luminance in the untested eye, as well as with a bandpass oriented filtered noise in the other eye at low spatial frequency (0.25 c/d). Threshold elevation, which represents interocular suppression, was assessed using a the dichoptic masking paradigm (i.e. the contrast threshold difference between the target only and masked conditions), for each eye. Orientation selectivity of the interocular suppression as reflected by dichoptic masking was quantified by the difference between the parallel and orthogonal masking configurations. Two levels of mask's contrast (3 times or 10 times that of an individual's contrast threshold) were tested in this study. Results: The strength of dichoptic masking suppression was stronger at high, rather than low mask contrast in both amblyopic and control subjects. Normal controls showed orientation-dependent dichoptic masking suppression both under high and low contrast levels. However, amblyopes showed orientation-tuned dichoptic masking suppression only under the high contrast level, but untuned under the low contrast level. Conclusions: We demonstrate that interocular suppression assessed by dichoptic masking is contrast-dependent in amblyopia, being orientation-tuned only at high suprathreshold contrast levels of the mask.

Rapid alternate monocular deprivation does not affect binocular balance and correlation in human adults.

Recent studies show that the human adult visual system exhibits neural plasticity. For instance, short-term monocular deprivation shifts the eye dominance in favor of the deprived eye. This phenomenon is believed to occur in the primary visual cortex by reinstating neural plasticity. However, it is unknown whether the changes in eye dominance after monocularly depriving the visual input can also be induced by alternately depriving both eyes. In this study, we found no changes in binocular balance and interocular correlation sensitivity after a rapid (7 Hz), alternate and monocular deprivation for one hour in adults. Therefore, the effect of short-term monocular deprivation cannot seem to be emulated by alternately and rapidly depriving both eyes.Significance statementPrevious work has shown that short-term binocular function disruption, which its most extreme form is monocular deprivation, could induce neural plasticity in adult visual system. In this study, we found a balanced deprivation of binocular function could not induce a neuroplastic change in human adults. It appears that ocular dominance plasticity in human adults is unique in so far as it is only driven by an input imbalance not balanced deprivation of binocular function.

Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.

Purpose: It has been suggested that amblyopes present impaired motion extrapolation mechanisms. In this study, we used the flash grab effect (FGE), the illusory mislocalization of a briefly flashed stimulus in the direction of a reversing moving background, to investigate whether the amblyopic visual system can correct overextrapolation. Methods: Thirteen amblyopes and 13 control subjects participated in the experiment. We measured the monocular FGE magnitude for each subject. Two spatial frequency (2 and 8 cycles), two texture configurations (square wave or sine wave), and two speed conditions (270 degrees/s and 67.5 degrees/s) were tested. In addition, control subjects were further tested in reduced luminance conditions. Results: Compared with controls, amblyopes exhibited a larger FGE magnitude both in their fellow eye (FE) and amblyopic eye (AE). The FGE magnitude of their AE was significantly larger than that of the FE. In a control experiment, we observed that the FGE magnitude increases with the decreasing of the luminance. The FGE magnitude of amblyopes fall into the same range as that of controls under reduced luminance conditions. Conclusions: We observed a lager FGE in patients with amblyopia, which indicates that the amblyopic visual system does not accurately correct the overextrapolation when a moving object abruptly reverses its direction. This spatiotemporal processing deficit could be ascribed to delayed visual processing in the amblyopic visual system.

Some psychophysical tasks measure ocular dominance plasticity more reliably than others.

In the recent decade, studies have shown that short-term monocular deprivation strengthens the deprived eye's contribution to binocular vision. However, the magnitude of the change in eye dominance after monocular deprivation (i.e., the patching effect) has been found to be different between different methods and within the same method. There are three possible explanations for the discrepancy. First, the mechanisms underlying the patching effect that are probed by different measurement tasks might exist at different neural sites. Second, the test-retest variability of the same test can produce inconsistent results. Third, the magnitude of the patching effect itself within the same observer can vary across separate days or experimental sessions. To explore these possibilities, we assessed the test-retest reliability of the three most commonly used tasks (binocular rivalry, binocular combination, and dichoptic masking) and the repeatability of the shift in eye dominance after short-term monocular deprivation for each of the task. Two variations for binocular phase combination were used, at one and many contrasts of the stimuli. Also, two variations for dichoptic masking were employed; the orientation of the mask grating was either horizontal or vertical. Thus, five different tasks were evaluated. We hoped to resolve some of the inconsistencies reported in the literature concerning this form of visual plasticity. In this study, we also aimed to recommend a measurement method that would allow us to better understand its physiological basis and the underpinning of visual disorders.

Short-term monocular deprivation induces an interocular delay.

Short term monocular deprivation modulates ocular dominance, such that the previously deprived eye's contribution to the binocular percept increases, supposedly as a result of changes in contrast-gain. Therefore, the processing time of the previously patched eye would be expected to speed up as a result of an increase in contrast gain. In order to test this hypothesis, this study examines the effects of short-term monocular deprivation on interocular synchronicity. The present study uses a paradigm based on the Pulfrich phenomenon. The stimulus used for testing consists of elements defining a cylinder rotating in depth, that allows measurement of any interocular delay. The interocular delay was measured at baseline before patching and at outcome, after one hour of monocular deprivation with an opaque or translucent patch. Contrary to expectations, short-term monocular deprivation induces an interocular delay, albeit not always significant, in the previously patched eye. The amplitude of this effect is larger with opaque patching compared to translucent patching. These results are the first report of a non-beneficial effect - i.e. a slowing down in the processing time of the previously patched-eye. They indicate that the plasticity effects of monocular deprivation are not exclusively mediated by contrast gain mechanisms and that light adaptation mechanisms might also be involved in the plasticity resulting from short-term monocular deprivation.

A prospective study evaluating congenital CMV infection in Mayotte and La Reunion Islands (France).

OBJECTIVES Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) affects around 3400 newborns each year in France, of whom 700 will develop sequelae, primarily sensorineural hearing loss. Our objectives were (1) to evaluate incidence of cCMV in two French departments located in the Indian Ocean: Mayotte and La Reunion, and (2) evaluate interest and feasibility/acceptability of universal screening of cCMV at birth. MATERIAL AND METHODS We implemented a universal neonatal CMV screening in Mayotte during 7 months in 2019 and in La Reunion during one month in March 2020. Saliva swabs were collected in the first three days of life, and tested for CMV DNA by PCR. A short survey allowed evaluating whether this screening is acceptable and feasible. RESULTS: A total of 1026 newborns were screened: 854 in Mayotte and 172 in La Reunion. In Mayotte, cCMV incidence was evaluated at a minimum of 1.6 % (95 % CI 0.94-2.81). In La Reunion, cCMV incidence was evaluated at a minimum of 1.2 % (95 % CI -0.20-4.57). All cCMV infants were born to mothers with non-primary CMV infection. Only 0.7 % parents refused the screening. CONCLUSIONS cCMV incidence in Mayotte and La Reunion is higher than in metropolitan France. This diagnosis should not be overlooked, especially since the time dedicated to screening and its feeling by the parents seem to be acceptable.

The Flash-lag Effect in Amblyopia.

Purpose: Amblyopes suffer a defect in temporal processing, presumably because of a neural delay in their visual processing. By measuring flash-lag effect (FLE), we investigate whether the amblyopic visual system could compensate for the intrinsic neural delay due to visual information transmissions from the retina to the cortex. Methods: Eleven adults with amblyopia and 11 controls with normal vision participated in this study. We assessed the monocular FLE magnitude for each subject by using a typical FLE paradigm: a bar moved horizontally, while a flashed bar briefly appeared above or below it. Three luminance contrasts of the flashed bar were tested: 0.2, 0.6, and 1. Results: All participants, controls and those with amblyopia, showed a typical FLE. However, the FLE magnitude of participants with amblyopia was significantly shorter than that of the control participants, for both their amblyopic eye (AE) and fellow eye (FE). A nonsignificant difference was found in FLE magnitude between the AE and the FE. Conclusions: We demonstrate a reduced FLE both in the AE as well as the FE of patients with amblyopia, suggesting a global visual processing deficit. We suggest it may be attributed to a more limited spatiotemporal extent of facilitatory anticipatory activity within the amblyopic primary visual cortex.

Interocular Suppression as Revealed by Dichoptic Masking Is Orientation-Dependent and Imbalanced in Amblyopia.

Purpose: We investigate the orientation tuning of interocular suppression using a dichoptic masking paradigm in adult controls and amblyopes. Methods: Fourteen adults with anisometropic or mixed amblyopia and 10 control adults participated in our study. Contrast sensitivity was measured by presenting a target Gabor in the tested eye and mean luminance in the untested eye (monocular) and by presenting a target in the tested eye and a bandpass oriented filtered noise in the other eye (masked). Interocular suppression was defined as the thresholds difference between the monocular and masked conditions for each eye. Interocular suppression was measured under parallel and orthogonal suppression configurations. The peak spatial frequency of the target and mask was 0.25 c/d in experiment 1 (low), 1.31 c/d in experiment 2 (mid), and 6.87 c/d in experiment 3 (high). Results: The masking suppression induced by the amblyopic eye was less strong than that induced by the fellow eye. The suppression from the fellow eye was similar to that observed in the controls. Interocular suppression under parallel configuration was less strong than under orthogonal configuration in amblyopes at low and mid spatial frequency, but not at high spatial frequency. Conclusions: We demonstrate that the abnormal interocular masking in amblyopia displays the expected characteristic of orientation selectivity expected of normal controls at low and mid spatial frequency, but not at high spatial frequency. The dichoptic masking imbalance between the eyes of amblyopes results in a net suppression of the amblyopic eye during binocular viewing, modeling clinical suppression.